Chronicling the high cost of our legal system

Overlawyered

July 18th, 2003 at 2:43 pm

“Once a C-section, always a C-section” policy blamed on legal risks

Oregon: “Women who have delivered a baby by Caesarean section must deliver their next child the same way if they give birth at Merle West Medical Center. The hospital’s board of directors today announced a new policy that supports a decision by local obstetricians to not deliver a baby vaginally if the mother has had a previous Caesarean section, a surgical procedure that delivers the baby by making an incision in the abdomen and uterus. The decision is based more on legal implications related to the potentially high-risk procedure than on medical statistics, said Dr. Rick Zwartverwer, vice president for medical affairs at Merle West Medical Center.” (Marcia McGonigle, “Hospital alters C-section policy”, Klamath Falls (Ore.) Herald & News, Jul. 8)(see Feb. 5, 2001). Update Nov. 29, 2004: New York Times covers the story.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Related posts


In ; ; ;
3
  • 1

    In defense of caps

    With this post, I state part of the case for the Bush proposal, and address Dr. Chusid’s criticisms of it. While Dr. Chusid states that he agrees with me that medical malpractice reform is a serious issue, he cites a…

    PointOfLaw Featured Discussion on September 22nd, 2004
  • 2

    In defense of caps

    With this post, I state part of the case for the Bush proposal, and address Dr. Chusid’s criticisms of it. While Dr. Chusid states that he agrees with me that medical malpractice reform is a serious issue, he cites a…

    PointOfLaw Featured Discussion on September 22nd, 2004
  • 3

    I’ll Have My Baby Over-Easy, Some Wheat Toast, Butter on The Side

    No News Is…No News Today’s

    CodeBlueBlog on November 19th, 2004