Damned if you do, damned if you don't files: "Cyber-bullying"

| | Comments (2)

School districts have learned that they cannot discipline students for abusive Internet postings they make off-campus. Layshack v. Hermitage Area School District, No. 074465 (pending 3d Cir.); Dwyer v. OceanPort School District No. 03-6005 (D. N.J.) ($117,500 settlement to student suspended over web site). "Lawyers say school districts are in a legal quandary: If they punish a student for something they did off school grounds, they could get hit with a freedom of speech claim. If they do nothing, they could get hit with failure to act litigation." (Tresa Baldas, "As 'cyber-bullying' grows, so do lawsuits", National Law Journal, Dec. 10).

2 Comments

School Districts brought this on themselves. When I went to school the school's responsibility for me stopped the instant I left school property. Now school districts try to govern every aspect od a student's life both on and off campus. My niece just recieved a three day suspension for smoking. Now for the kicker. My niece is 18 years old and was smoking at the local mall on a Saturday afternoon. It seems that students are forced to sign a "Conduct Contract" in which they agree not to smoke, dring or do drugs. This "contract" is enforcable 24-7. A teacher saw her at the mall and turned her in. With crap like this going on I have very little sympathy for school districts.

Exactly the intended effect! If there is a course of action available to you which does not result in litigation, well, how are the lawyers supposed to suck up all the wealth?

Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 4.1

Archives