0%? Surely that violates a diversity statute these days?
ras on April 3rd, 2008
2
Are you suggesting cussing quotas?
Insomniac on April 3rd, 2008
3
May I offer my services to spice things up a notch? (runs for cover, hehe)
…seriously though, it’s mighty refreshing to see pages where the language is kept at a professional level. Kudos!
Steve F. on April 3rd, 2008
4
That’s why Ron and Todd are allowed to read Overlawyered, just as soon as they’ve finished the day’s Bible verses.
Ned Flanders on April 3rd, 2008
5
Thats fudging unbelievable. I would have thought there would have been more profanity dang nabbit.
Elliot on April 3rd, 2008
6
Throwing down a gauntlet are we Walter?
A new game for the Internet perhaps?
Who will be the first to register a tick of the meter on OL?
Which words will register.
Are certain dirty words worth more than other words?
Since human nature almost guarantees that sites with higher Cuss-O-Meter readings will attract more readers will Internet scandals ensue as bloggers self-comment with dirty words to inflate their reading.
Only time will tell……but surely readership will increase in the short haul as we wait anxiously for the first to “go over the line.”
There may even me a country and western song in here somewhere.
Good response to clueless Marie Cocco column that celebrated tenth anniversary of corrupt, undemocratic multi-state tobacco settlement [Sullum, Reason Hit and Run] New details on Philadelphia prosecution of ring that allegedly helped itself to class action proceeds by filing...
Beck and Herrmann: Initially, wed invite anybody who doesnt think that plaintiffs in product liability litigation arent asking state courts to ignore FDA decisions to read the statements of fact in either of these briefs. The causation claims plaintiffs advance...
My post yesterday on a San Francisco jurys vindication of the oil companys conduct drew notice at LexMonitor and ShopFloor (with a second post linking to NAMs briefs in Alien Tort cases). And at National Review Online, Andrew McCarthy covers...
Discussion of medical malpractice law in the blog world is likely to heat up soon, what with University of Texas law professor David Hyman having joined the Volokh Conspiracy as a permanent contributor. One of the areas in which Prof....
Securities Docket: University of Michigan Law School Professor Adam Pritchards recent proposal to reform securities class actions via shareholder proposal has moved from a purely academic discussion to the real world. Prof. Pritchard reports today that a shareholder in Alaska...
As many of you know, "patent trolls" are parties that buy up issued patents for the sole purpose of using the patents offensively to collect licensing fees (or, failing that, to...
is foreclosed by Seventh Circuit precedent, and late 1800s Supreme Court precedent, rules the district judge in NRA v. City of Oak Park City of Chicago:...
0%? Surely that violates a diversity statute these days?
Are you suggesting cussing quotas?
May I offer my services to spice things up a notch? (runs for cover, hehe)
…seriously though, it’s mighty refreshing to see pages where the language is kept at a professional level. Kudos!
That’s why Ron and Todd are allowed to read Overlawyered, just as soon as they’ve finished the day’s Bible verses.
Thats fudging unbelievable. I would have thought there would have been more profanity dang nabbit.
Throwing down a gauntlet are we Walter?
A new game for the Internet perhaps?
Who will be the first to register a tick of the meter on OL?
Which words will register.
Are certain dirty words worth more than other words?
Since human nature almost guarantees that sites with higher Cuss-O-Meter readings will attract more readers will Internet scandals ensue as bloggers self-comment with dirty words to inflate their reading.
Only time will tell……but surely readership will increase in the short haul as we wait anxiously for the first to “go over the line.”
There may even me a country and western song in here somewhere.
For this I’m grateful.