• Wronged wife loses suit under California “Drug Dealer Liability Act” (DDLA) against mistress who supplied crack cocaine to husband [OnPoint News]
• “D.C. Circuit to Former Judge in Pants Lawsuit: Follow the Rules” [NLJ, more, earlier]
• “Law firm demands retailer destroy all copies of Olivia Munn comic, retailer refuses” [BoingBoing, HeavyInk, earlier on TJIC]
• Can’t find jury for tobacco trial: “Lawyers excused a woman who said people have no right to sue over diseases that are disclosed on the warning label of a package.” [Russell Jackson, Chamber-backed W.V. Record]
• Despite widespread misconception to the contrary, editing comments generally does not open blogger to liability over what remains [Citizen Media Law]
• To heck with HIPAA, introduce your patients to each other if you think they’ll get along [Musings of a Dinosaur]
• Devoted daughter vs. RSPCA: epic will contest in Britain over family farm bequest [Times Online]
• Woman found guilty after planting dead rat in meal at upscale restaurant [Appleton Post-Crescent via Lowering the Bar and Obscure Store]

Filed under: alienation of affection, bloggers and the law, finger in the chili, HIPAA, illegal drugs, jury selection, Roy Pearson, wills and trusts