• I also love the part when he can point out the employee who waited on him, because she treated him so badly. His guy has such a chip on his shoulder that it must be a really large coat.

  • One would think that avoiding the embarrassment of people finding out that a big shot lawyer is not competent enough to travel on a plane without losing his coat would be worth a lot more than $800.

  • Most places have a sign somewhere that states they are not responsible for lost or stolen items. This guy is being vexatious.

  • And wouldn’t you know, he has a full-bore obnoxious auto accident plaintiff lawyering web site. Shocking.

  • Another attorney who will never get my business.

    If he is irresponsible enough to think others are responsible for his own failure, image who is at fault if a filing is late, or a phone call never returned.

  • I think we can shorten “failure to state a cause of action” to “fail” for this one.

  • Hmmm, I wonder who would be responsible if he got a rash on his behind from not wiping well enough?

  • I found it. I’m keeping it. Finders keepers, schmuck.

    Go ahead, sue me.

  • You’re all very good with the wisecracks, but if you don’t mind, please take a second look at that letter.

    That’s right. Mr. Ogletree has got his own stationery.

    Back. Off.

  • In the ten years since the cause of the Streisand Effect was isolated, one would think that a person who was successful enough to have his own stationery would be aware of its ravages.

    Guess not.

  • News Flash: Three-year-old brother of teen who found abandoned leather coat at airport strangles in sleeve! Negligent homicide charges pondered by DA!

  • It is my understanding that Ogletree has left his firm and has filed papers to create his new law firm with ex-judge Roy Pearson. The new partnership, The Pear Tree Law Firm, is expected to open offices soon.

  • From his letter, “…suit will be filed in Harris County, Texas, against all three entities. Then, all of you can have your lawyers blame each other in court…”

    No, you knucklehead: they’ll blame you, as they should for your own negligence in failing to secure your own belongings. Get a life.

  • $800 for a Polo coat? For that kind of dough I’d want a brand you can’t buy at Macy’s.

  • I think this guy just wants a new coat. Despite his failure at securing his own property who is to say the silly coat cost $800 in the first place. I think he should get over it and eat the cost like the rest of common sense abiding citizens do. Besides its been nearly 3 months and still no lawsuit I doubt he got his new jacket either. But hey you never know Airlines don’t want to lose business so they may pay it out to keep away from the bad press. A lot of good that did them.

  • Other than Ogletree’s word, how do we know that he ever owned such a coat, that he took said coat to the airport and left it there, and that it’s worth $800 in used condition?

    It looks like he wants money without living up to his end of the burden of proof.

    Perhaps it’s just me, but the more expensive an item I own, the more likely I am to take better care of it.

  • I’d like to see him brought up on an ethics charge for a frivolous demand letter, and be sentenced to sit through a 1L Property lecture on bailments.

  • […] story was recently forwarded to me in an e-mail. Walter Olson had it up at Overlawyered.com weeks ago, but I missed it for some reason. So I had to re-post it as yet another example of why we […]