• Furor as NLRB issues complaint against Boeing for planning to open S.C. plant [Wichita Business Journal, Costa/NR “Corner”, Wood/ShopFloor, more, Tom Bevan/RCP, Ira Stoll, Hirsch/Workplace Prof, Megan McArdle, Jonathan Adler]
• Perp meanwhile declared not criminally responsible and awaits release: “Jury orders Nordstrom to pay $1.6 M to Bethesda stabbing victims” [WaPo]
• Not so reliable: how eyewitness and confession testimony can result in convicting the innocent [Brandon Garrett, Slate]
• Trying to pin down who merits label of “patent troll” [Michael Risch, Prawfs, and followup] “Digital Innovators vs. the Patent Trolls” [Peter Huber, WSJ]
• Publishers as targets in pharma suits? Philadelphia product liability case names as defendant the company that put out drug fact sheet [Beck]
• Regulate-Google schemes: “If search neutrality is the answer, what’s the question?” [Manne/Wright, TotM]
• Hey, John Boehner’s tweeting about my blog post [@johnboehner]

Filed under: labor unions, patent trolls, pharmaceuticals, prosecution, third party liability for crime