• Hey, why don’t we invade people’s privacy so we can recruit them as figureheads for our privacy-invasion class action? [Cal Biz Lit, earlier on Starbucks pot-convictions case] Class-action coupon settlements are a no-win for consumers [Michelle Singletary, WaPo]
• “Former Silicosis Clients Sue O’Quinn Law Firm, Estate” [Texas Lawyer via PoL, related earlier]
• Gathering ammunition for suits: “Are your employees recording you?” [Hyman]
• Canada: “Inflatables too dangerous for school fair” [Free-Range Kids]
• Evaluating the effectiveness of medical liability reforms [Kachalia & Mello, NEJM]
• “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About ‘Judge Judy’” [TV Squad]
• “Woman awarded $45,000 after dog kills cat” [six years ago on Overlawyered]

Filed under: class actions, John O'Quinn, lawyering vs. privacy, medical malpractice, recreation