2 Comments

  • Mary Shelley, call your editor.

  • There were shades of this in Scalia’s Windsor and Robert’s Obergefell dissents:

    “It is one thing for a society to elect change; it is another for a court of law to impose change by adjudging those who oppose it hostes humani generis, enemies of the human race. . .In the majority’s telling, this story is black-and-white: Hate your neighbor or come along with us. The truth is more complicated.”

    “It is one thing for the majority to conclude that the Constitution protects a right to same-sex marriage; it is something else to portray everyone who does not share the majority’s “better informed understanding” as bigoted.”

    Someone who knows he’s right – absolutely knows it, to the point considering other views is pointless – scares me, even if I happen to agree with him.