<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Class action firm subject to judgment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:25:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=89#comment-37</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Update: Ness Motley and James Down&lt;/strong&gt;

A feature from the Chicago Tribune on the Ness Motley sellout of its clients in the James Blair Down case (see Jul. 7 and follow-ups Aug. 24 and Jan. 17) is revealing about forum-shopping:[Blair] Hahn told his clients he knew...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: Ness Motley and James Down</strong></p>
<p>A feature from the Chicago Tribune on the Ness Motley sellout of its clients in the James Blair Down case (see Jul. 7 and follow-ups Aug. 24 and Jan. 17) is revealing about forum-shopping:[Blair] Hahn told his clients he knew&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Legal Reader		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/07/class-action-firm-subject-to-judgment/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Legal Reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=89#comment-36</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Big Litigation Firm Found to Have Acted Unethically&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;A federal jury in Chicago ordered a prominent South Carolina law firm yesterday to pay $36 million to a former client for what the jury found was unethical conduct in a class-action lawsuit. The firm, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson &amp;...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Big Litigation Firm Found to Have Acted Unethically</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;A federal jury in Chicago ordered a prominent South Carolina law firm yesterday to pay $36 million to a former client for what the jury found was unethical conduct in a class-action lawsuit. The firm, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson &#038;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
