<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Overreading mammograms	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/10/overreading-mammograms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/10/overreading-mammograms/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/10/overreading-mammograms/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=359#comment-186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gladwell on mammography&lt;/strong&gt;

The New Yorker&#039;s Malcolm Gladwell is out with an article on the very imperfect art/science of mammogram-reading. MedRants focuses in on the litigation implications; there&#039;s an enormous leeway to second-guess the readings of radiologists and others who ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gladwell on mammography</strong></p>
<p>The New Yorker&#8217;s Malcolm Gladwell is out with an article on the very imperfect art/science of mammogram-reading. MedRants focuses in on the litigation implications; there&#8217;s an enormous leeway to second-guess the readings of radiologists and others who &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/10/overreading-mammograms/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=359#comment-185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Overreading mammograms&lt;/strong&gt;

American women who get routine mammograms are more likely to be called back for additional tests than women in other countries, even though such caution does not result in more cases of breast cancer being found, a new study has...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overreading mammograms</strong></p>
<p>American women who get routine mammograms are more likely to be called back for additional tests than women in other countries, even though such caution does not result in more cases of breast cancer being found, a new study has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
