<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New York abolishes ad damnum	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-241</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;More on &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt; clauses&lt;/strong&gt;

Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on <i>ad damnum</i> clauses</strong></p>
<p>Regarding ad damnum clauses (see May 15, 2004, cross-posting an Overlawyered item originally dated Nov. 5, 2003), a commercial litigator at a large New York firm writes to say:I would call your attention to the local rules of the U.S&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/11/new-york-abolishes-ad-damnum/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=448#comment-238</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;New York abolishes &lt;i&gt;ad damnum&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Late last month New York Gov. George Pataki signed into law a bill that will abolish the requirement that a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit specify at the outset (in its &quot;ad damnum&quot; clause) the amount in dollar damages...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New York abolishes <i>ad damnum</i></strong></p>
<p>Late last month New York Gov. George Pataki signed into law a bill that will abolish the requirement that a personal injury or wrongful death lawsuit specify at the outset (in its &#8220;ad damnum&#8221; clause) the amount in dollar damages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
