<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California&#8217;s antispam law	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/californias-antispam-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/californias-antispam-law/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Walloworld		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/californias-antispam-law/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walloworld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=525#comment-277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Anti-Spam&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;Walter Olson doesn&#039;t like &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.overlawyered.com/archives/000553.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the California anti-spam legislation&lt;/a&gt;, in part for reasons I&#039;m not quite certain of since I&#039;m not a Wall Street ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Anti-Spam</strong></p>
<p>Walter Olson doesn&#8217;t like <a href="https://www.overlawyered.com/archives/000553.html" rel="nofollow">the California anti-spam legislation</a>, in part for reasons I&#8217;m not quite certain of since I&#8217;m not a Wall Street &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
