<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Forum shopping	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/forum-shopping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/forum-shopping/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/forum-shopping/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=573#comment-316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;2003&#039;s largest verdicts&lt;/strong&gt;

The Associated Press uncritically reports Lawyers Weekly USA&#039;s claim that the top ten jury verdicts of 2003 were supposedly &quot;unusually&quot; small, with the biggest &quot;only&quot; $254 million (Dec. 15). (&quot;Juries Hand Out Fewer Big-Ticket Verdicts&quot;, Jan. 2). Which ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2003&#8217;s largest verdicts</strong></p>
<p>The Associated Press uncritically reports Lawyers Weekly USA&#8217;s claim that the top ten jury verdicts of 2003 were supposedly &#8220;unusually&#8221; small, with the biggest &#8220;only&#8221; $254 million (Dec. 15). (&#8220;Juries Hand Out Fewer Big-Ticket Verdicts&#8221;, Jan. 2). Which &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
