<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: McDonald&#8217;s coffee revisited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 03:19:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Urban legends and Stella Liebeck and the McDonald&#039;s coffee case&lt;/strong&gt;

Thirteen courts have reported opinions looking at product-liability/failure-to-warn claims alleging that coffee was &quot;unreasonably dangerous&quot; and the provider was thus liable when the plaintiff spilled coffee on him- or herself. Twelve courts correctly ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Urban legends and Stella Liebeck and the McDonald&#8217;s coffee case</strong></p>
<p>Thirteen courts have reported opinions looking at product-liability/failure-to-warn claims alleging that coffee was &#8220;unreasonably dangerous&#8221; and the provider was thus liable when the plaintiff spilled coffee on him- or herself. Twelve courts correctly &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curmudgeonly Clerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Remedial Torts For Reformers&lt;/strong&gt;

Liebeck v. McDonald&#039;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#039;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Remedial Torts For Reformers</strong></p>
<p>Liebeck v. McDonald&#8217;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#8217;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curmudgeonly Clerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 11:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Remedial Torts For Reformers&lt;/strong&gt;

Liebeck v. McDonald&#039;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#039;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Remedial Torts For Reformers</strong></p>
<p>Liebeck v. McDonald&#8217;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#8217;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curmudgeonly Clerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Remedial Torts For Reformers&lt;/strong&gt;

Liebeck v. McDonald&#039;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#039;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Remedial Torts For Reformers</strong></p>
<p>Liebeck v. McDonald&#8217;s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. (a.k.a The McDonald&#8217;s Coffee Case) is the litigation that will not die. It has&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProfessorBainbridge.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorBainbridge.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Trial Lawyer Propaganda at Kos&lt;/strong&gt;

In what reads like a press release from John Edwards and/or ATLA (the trial lawyer group), the Daily Kos features a ringing defense of the verdict in Stella Liebeck&#039;s suit against McDonalds. You don&#039;t remember Stella? She was the woman
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trial Lawyer Propaganda at Kos</strong></p>
<p>In what reads like a press release from John Edwards and/or ATLA (the trial lawyer group), the Daily Kos features a ringing defense of the verdict in Stella Liebeck&#8217;s suit against McDonalds. You don&#8217;t remember Stella? She was the woman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProfessorBainbridge.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorBainbridge.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Trial Lawyer Propaganda at Kos&lt;/strong&gt;

In what reads like a press release from John Edwards and/or ATLA (the trial lawyer group), the Daily Kos features a ringing defense of the verdict in Stella Liebeck&#039;s suit against McDonalds. You don&#039;t remember Stella? She was the woman
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Trial Lawyer Propaganda at Kos</strong></p>
<p>In what reads like a press release from John Edwards and/or ATLA (the trial lawyer group), the Daily Kos features a ringing defense of the verdict in Stella Liebeck&#8217;s suit against McDonalds. You don&#8217;t remember Stella? She was the woman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ethicalEsq		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ethicalEsq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Hot News About Hot Cocoa&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;coffee cup&quot;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hot News About Hot Cocoa</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;coffee cup&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Le blog de Polyscopique		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Le blog de Polyscopique]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2004 22:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;La Providence&lt;/strong&gt;

Tu vois, mon petit, quand j&#039;?tais jeune et qu&#039;on sortait dehors, on mettait pas de lotion solaire. Quand on allait en bicycle, on mettait pas de casque. Il y avait pas de date d&#039;expiration sur les yougourts: quand on ?tait...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La Providence</strong></p>
<p>Tu vois, mon petit, quand j&#8217;?tais jeune et qu&#8217;on sortait dehors, on mettait pas de lotion solaire. Quand on allait en bicycle, on mettait pas de casque. Il y avait pas de date d&#8217;expiration sur les yougourts: quand on ?tait&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Legal Reader		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Legal Reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 19:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Blawgosphere Ponder the McDonalds Coffee Tort Case&lt;/strong&gt;

Overlawyered.com is commenting on a current dialogue between The Curmudgeonly Clerk (here) and Professor Bernsteing of the Volokh Conspiracy (here and here) on the case in which a jury handed a $2.9 million verdict to Ms. Stella Liebeck after she...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blawgosphere Ponder the McDonalds Coffee Tort Case</strong></p>
<p>Overlawyered.com is commenting on a current dialogue between The Curmudgeonly Clerk (here) and Professor Bernsteing of the Volokh Conspiracy (here and here) on the case in which a jury handed a $2.9 million verdict to Ms. Stella Liebeck after she&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Curmudgeonly Clerk		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2003/12/mcdonalds-coffee-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Curmudgeonly Clerk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=555#comment-294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The McDonald&#039;s Coffee Case&lt;/strong&gt;

Professor Bernstein has a brief post in which he argues that the infamous McDonald&#039;s coffee spill case?Liebeck v. McDonald&#039;s Restaurants,...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The McDonald&#8217;s Coffee Case</strong></p>
<p>Professor Bernstein has a brief post in which he argues that the infamous McDonald&#8217;s coffee spill case?Liebeck v. McDonald&#8217;s Restaurants,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
