<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Edwards&#8217; persuasive powers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: An Englishman's Castle		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Englishman's Castle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Personal not political&lt;/strong&gt;

I have been mulling over whether to post this or not for several reasons so excuse me if it seems inappropriate. But I can&#039;t get on with normal blogging until I clear this out of my system. Four years ago...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Personal not political</strong></p>
<p>I have been mulling over whether to post this or not for several reasons so excuse me if it seems inappropriate. But I can&#8217;t get on with normal blogging until I clear this out of my system. Four years ago&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 11:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Kerry taps Edwards -- has Trial Lawyers, Inc. entered the race?&lt;/strong&gt;

The big news of the day is that presidential contendor John Kerry has tapped fellow senator John Edwards of North Carolina to be his running mate. As most Americans are aware, Edwards grew up the son of a textile mill...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kerry taps Edwards &#8212; has Trial Lawyers, Inc. entered the race?</strong></p>
<p>The big news of the day is that presidential contendor John Kerry has tapped fellow senator John Edwards of North Carolina to be his running mate. As most Americans are aware, Edwards grew up the son of a textile mill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Baseball Crank		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baseball Crank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;POLITICS:  Edwardian Nightmare&lt;/strong&gt;

I gotta say, all of a sudden my prediction last January of Edwards and Kerry as the top 2 candidates for the Democrats (in that order), with Lieberman a distant sixth and Dean a candidate with some appeal and advantages...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>POLITICS:  Edwardian Nightmare</strong></p>
<p>I gotta say, all of a sudden my prediction last January of Edwards and Kerry as the top 2 candidates for the Democrats (in that order), with Lieberman a distant sixth and Dean a candidate with some appeal and advantages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Notes from the (Legal) Underground		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notes from the (Legal) Underground]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 18:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Walter Olson Buries the Lead&lt;/strong&gt;

News flash: Walter Olson at overlawyered.com admits that some lawsuits have merit. In a post about John Edwards’ past as a trial lawyer, Olson states: “I don&#039;t assert that every lawsuit blaming obstetricians for infant brain damage is unfounded.” In
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Walter Olson Buries the Lead</strong></p>
<p>News flash: Walter Olson at overlawyered.com admits that some lawsuits have merit. In a post about John Edwards’ past as a trial lawyer, Olson states: “I don&#8217;t assert that every lawsuit blaming obstetricians for infant brain damage is unfounded.” In</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: famous and nonfamous strangers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[famous and nonfamous strangers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-402</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards&#039; ethical past?&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting article at Overlawyered.com about John Edward&#039;s past as a trial lawyer. Seems he made much of his fortune bilking...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards&#8217; ethical past?</strong></p>
<p>Interesting article at Overlawyered.com about John Edward&#8217;s past as a trial lawyer. Seems he made much of his fortune bilking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sick Transit		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sick Transit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;From the Department of Duh&lt;/strong&gt;

From an article about Edwards&#039; reliance on questionable science in his trial-lawyer days:

But some of Edwards&#039; critics say that as a trial lawyer, he relied more on his verbal skills than the latest scientific evidence to persuade juries.
...
Ed...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From the Department of Duh</strong></p>
<p>From an article about Edwards&#8217; reliance on questionable science in his trial-lawyer days:</p>
<p>But some of Edwards&#8217; critics say that as a trial lawyer, he relied more on his verbal skills than the latest scientific evidence to persuade juries.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Ed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Legal Memo-Random		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Legal Memo-Random]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 13:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Overlawyered on Edwards&lt;/strong&gt;

Overlawyered takes a moment to reflect on some of Democratic primary candidate John Edwards, and the sorts of cases that helped him make his personal fortune. Unfortunately, in retrospect and without too many facts on individual cases, its hard to
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Overlawyered on Edwards</strong></p>
<p>Overlawyered takes a moment to reflect on some of Democratic primary candidate John Edwards, and the sorts of cases that helped him make his personal fortune. Unfortunately, in retrospect and without too many facts on individual cases, its hard to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BALASUBRAMANIA'S MANIA		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BALASUBRAMANIA'S MANIA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Edwards / Trial Wins&lt;/strong&gt;

Overlawyered flags a potential Edwards issue here (cited with approval by Mr. Kaus here). Except there&#039;s really no issue. I guess it&#039;s a politics issue, and not really a legal or ethical issue. It would make sense to be specific...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edwards / Trial Wins</strong></p>
<p>Overlawyered flags a potential Edwards issue here (cited with approval by Mr. Kaus here). Except there&#8217;s really no issue. I guess it&#8217;s a politics issue, and not really a legal or ethical issue. It would make sense to be specific&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BALASUBRAMANIA'S MANIA		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/edwards-persuasive-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BALASUBRAMANIA'S MANIA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=692#comment-398</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Edwards / Trial Wins&lt;/strong&gt;

Overlawyered flags a potential Edwards issue here (cited with approval by Mr. Kaus here). Except there&#039;s really no issue. I guess it&#039;s a politics issue, and not really a legal or ethical issue. It would made sense to be specific...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edwards / Trial Wins</strong></p>
<p>Overlawyered flags a potential Edwards issue here (cited with approval by Mr. Kaus here). Except there&#8217;s really no issue. I guess it&#8217;s a politics issue, and not really a legal or ethical issue. It would made sense to be specific&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
