<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;In Trial Work, Edwards Left a Trademark&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/in-trial-work-edwards-left-a-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/in-trial-work-edwards-left-a-trademark/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Notes from the (Legal) Underground		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/in-trial-work-edwards-left-a-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notes from the (Legal) Underground]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=725#comment-428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards Cont.&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&quot;junk science&quot; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702, David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards Cont.</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&#8220;junk science&#8221; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702, David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Notes from the (Legal) Underground		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/in-trial-work-edwards-left-a-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notes from the (Legal) Underground]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=725#comment-427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards Cont.&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&quot;junk science&quot; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702, David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards Cont.</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&#8220;junk science&#8221; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702, David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Notes from the (Legal) Underground		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/01/in-trial-work-edwards-left-a-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notes from the (Legal) Underground]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2004 17:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=725#comment-426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;John Edwards Cont.&lt;/strong&gt;

There&#039;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&quot;junk science&quot; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702 , David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>John Edwards Cont.</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s been some great insight on the John Edwards-&#8220;junk science&#8221; issue (which began with a comment by Walter Olson at overlawyered.com), from blog 702 , David Bernstein at the Volokh Conspiracy, more from overlawyered, and from Franco Castalone at the</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
