<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Asbestos X-rays rechecked&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/asbestos-x-rays-rechecked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/asbestos-x-rays-rechecked/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Descriptive Epistemology		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/asbestos-x-rays-rechecked/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Descriptive Epistemology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 12:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1319#comment-786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Great! Who do we sue?&lt;/strong&gt;

Via Overlawyered, the news that -- shock! -- Asbestos expert witnesses may have been a little less accurate than one would like when deciding where billions of dollars flow: A new look at X-rays used to help win billions of...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Great! Who do we sue?</strong></p>
<p>Via Overlawyered, the news that &#8212; shock! &#8212; Asbestos expert witnesses may have been a little less accurate than one would like when deciding where billions of dollars flow: A new look at X-rays used to help win billions of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
