<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stella Liebeck and McDonald&#8217;s coffee revisited II	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/stella-liebeck-and-mcdonalds-coffee-revisited-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/stella-liebeck-and-mcdonalds-coffee-revisited-ii/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: a tort et a travers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/stella-liebeck-and-mcdonalds-coffee-revisited-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a tort et a travers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1314#comment-784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Hey, Stell - Laaahhhhh!&lt;/strong&gt;

No Stella here, but if you need a Stella fix, please go to POL, OL, cites and trackbacks cited therein. Also see the site that memoralizes them all. See, too, my favorite Stella (must be 21 years old to view)....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hey, Stell &#8211; Laaahhhhh!</strong></p>
<p>No Stella here, but if you need a Stella fix, please go to POL, OL, cites and trackbacks cited therein. Also see the site that memoralizes them all. See, too, my favorite Stella (must be 21 years old to view)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: De Novo		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/stella-liebeck-and-mcdonalds-coffee-revisited-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-783</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[De Novo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 14:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1314#comment-783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Bad Analogies&lt;/strong&gt;

To Wings &amp; Vodka&#039;s dread, I suspect, I haven&#039;t quite finished with the McDonald&#039;s coffee case, which probably has the same Godwin&#039;s Rule-like properties on a blawg that abortion does on political blogs. While reading the otherwise useful comments to...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bad Analogies</strong></p>
<p>To Wings &#038; Vodka&#8217;s dread, I suspect, I haven&#8217;t quite finished with the McDonald&#8217;s coffee case, which probably has the same Godwin&#8217;s Rule-like properties on a blawg that abortion does on political blogs. While reading the otherwise useful comments to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/08/stella-liebeck-and-mcdonalds-coffee-revisited-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2004 02:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1314#comment-782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Why Stella Liebeck is important&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere continues to discuss the 1994 Stella Liebeck McDonald&#039;s coffee case. Overlawyered&#039;s August 3 entry has prompted a couple of responses, prompting an August 4 entry. &quot;Beldar&quot; (Aug. 3) is reminded of similarly frivolous cases he defended a...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Stella Liebeck is important</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere continues to discuss the 1994 Stella Liebeck McDonald&#8217;s coffee case. Overlawyered&#8217;s August 3 entry has prompted a couple of responses, prompting an August 4 entry. &#8220;Beldar&#8221; (Aug. 3) is reminded of similarly frivolous cases he defended a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
