<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Next at Point of Law: presidential debate	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/09/next-at-point-of-law-presidential-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/09/next-at-point-of-law-presidential-debate/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/09/next-at-point-of-law-presidential-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1446#comment-860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Welcome debate readers&lt;/strong&gt;

Our highly illuminating debate between Dr. Ron Chusid of Doctors for Kerry and our own Ted Frank has now gone for five energetic rounds (Chusid/ Frank/ Chusid/ Frank/ Chusid) with more to come. We&#039;re happy to say it&#039;s also attracted...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Welcome debate readers</strong></p>
<p>Our highly illuminating debate between Dr. Ron Chusid of Doctors for Kerry and our own Ted Frank has now gone for five energetic rounds (Chusid/ Frank/ Chusid/ Frank/ Chusid) with more to come. We&#8217;re happy to say it&#8217;s also attracted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
