Comments on: A right to assistance pets https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/a-right-to-assistance-pets/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:02:36 +0000 hourly 1 By: Lawsuit: you excluded my service monkey https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/a-right-to-assistance-pets/comment-page-1/#comment-25240 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:02:36 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1543#comment-25240 […] 12, 2005 (frequent-filing Californian); May 5, 2005 (Seattle grocery store owner fined $21,000); Oct. 25, 2004 (if you want to bring your pet into a San Francisco restaurant, get a note from your doctor); Dec. […]

]]> By: Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf! Arf!…. https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/a-right-to-assistance-pets/comment-page-1/#comment-25237 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:45:02 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1543#comment-25237 […] that legally protected status be accorded to “emotional-assistance” animals, see Oct. 25 and Dec. 2, 2004. For more cases in which disabled-rights-in-housing have led to noisy results, see […]

]]> By: f/k/a . . . . https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/a-right-to-assistance-pets/comment-page-1/#comment-917 Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:03:24 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1543#comment-917 two scents on dog law

Time Magazine reports that more and more “pet owners are seek[ing] justice for the ones they love,” with lawsuits over custody, veterinary-malpractice, pet-cruelty, landlord-tenant

]]>