<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In today&#8217;s WSJ	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1559#comment-932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;In the WSJ&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve got an op-ed in yesterday&#039;s Wall Street Journal discussing ballot measures that voters will decide in six states next Tuesday on litigation reform. Readers of this site got an advance look at a few of the highlights in this...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In the WSJ</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got an op-ed in yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal discussing ballot measures that voters will decide in six states next Tuesday on litigation reform. Readers of this site got an advance look at a few of the highlights in this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ProfessorBainbridge.com		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/10/in-todays-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProfessorBainbridge.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1559#comment-931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;California Proposition 64: Vote Yes (Early and Often)&lt;/strong&gt;

The perspicacious Walter Olson explains why you should vote YES on Prop 64:Proposition 64, which would apply modest pruning to the state&#039;s famously overgrown &quot;unfair competition&quot; consumer-rights law, also known as 17200 after its section number in the ...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>California Proposition 64: Vote Yes (Early and Often)</strong></p>
<p>The perspicacious Walter Olson explains why you should vote YES on Prop 64:Proposition 64, which would apply modest pruning to the state&#8217;s famously overgrown &#8220;unfair competition&#8221; consumer-rights law, also known as 17200 after its section number in the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
