<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: s. 17200 (and Proposition 64) roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: March 31 roundup		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-43878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[March 31 roundup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-43878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [California Civil Justice, earlier] [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] After nine years, the notorious Bill Lerach California-unfair-competition-law suit against Kwikset (over several screws from Taiwan in a lock marked &#8220;Made in America&#8221;) finally winds down [California Civil Justice, earlier] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Calif. court OKs countersuit in &quot;shakedown&quot; case&lt;/strong&gt;

Just over a year ago, following numerous scandals about law firms&#039; filing of mass shakedown suits based on California&#039;s s. 17200 unfair-competition law (UCL), the state&#039;s voters curtailed somewhat the law&#039;s extortive potential by requiring...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Calif. court OKs countersuit in &#8220;shakedown&#8221; case</strong></p>
<p>Just over a year ago, following numerous scandals about law firms&#8217; filing of mass shakedown suits based on California&#8217;s s. 17200 unfair-competition law (UCL), the state&#8217;s voters curtailed somewhat the law&#8217;s extortive potential by requiring&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;California&#039;s Proposition 79&lt;/strong&gt;

As CoyoteBlog (Oct. 18) notes, this ballot initiative on drug prices contains a sneaky, little-discussed provision that will empower trial lawyers to file bounty-hunting suits against pharmaceutical companies if the companies charge prices &quot;that lead...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>California&#8217;s Proposition 79</strong></p>
<p>As CoyoteBlog (Oct. 18) notes, this ballot initiative on drug prices contains a sneaky, little-discussed provision that will empower trial lawyers to file bounty-hunting suits against pharmaceutical companies if the companies charge prices &#8220;that lead&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: f/k/a . . . .		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/11/s-17200-and-proposition-64-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[f/k/a . . . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1563#comment-934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;along the sidewalk&lt;/strong&gt;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>along the sidewalk</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
