<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cosmetics class action update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Update: Judge OKs cosmetics class action settlement		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-38673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Update: Judge OKs cosmetics class action settlement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-38673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] 9). For earlier coverage of the controversial settlement, see Jul. 21, 2003, Apr. 14, May 19, and Dec. 3, 2004, and Jan. 14, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 9). For earlier coverage of the controversial settlement, see Jul. 21, 2003, Apr. 14, May 19, and Dec. 3, 2004, and Jan. 14, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judge blinks at cosmetics settlement		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-38672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judge blinks at cosmetics settlement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-38672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] for that no-blush, high-gloss, invisible-foundation antitrust class action (see Dec. 3 and links from there): at a two-hour hearing, federal judge Saundra Armstrong declined to approve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] for that no-blush, high-gloss, invisible-foundation antitrust class action (see Dec. 3 and links from there): at a two-hour hearing, federal judge Saundra Armstrong declined to approve [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Coyote Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/cosmetics-class-action-update/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coyote Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2004 03:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1662#comment-992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;You Get a Lipstick, I get $24 Million&lt;/strong&gt;

From Overlawyered:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You Get a Lipstick, I get $24 Million</strong></p>
<p>From Overlawyered:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
