<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: emotional-distress claim against divorce lawyer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:58:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: f/k/a . . . .		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-1042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[f/k/a . . . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1742#comment-1042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;the headless snowman&lt;/strong&gt;

Holiday Bonus:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>the headless snowman</strong></p>
<p>Holiday Bonus:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Declarations and Exclusions		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-emotional-distress-claim-against-divorce-lawyer/comment-page-1/#comment-1041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Declarations and Exclusions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 12:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1742#comment-1041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Emotional Rescue: Appellate Court Remains Skeptical Toward Emotional Distress Recovery in Legal Malpractice Cases&lt;/strong&gt;

Under current California law, emotional distress damages are generally not permitted in legal malpractice cases because the courts regard most such claims [rightly, in the view of Decs
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Emotional Rescue: Appellate Court Remains Skeptical Toward Emotional Distress Recovery in Legal Malpractice Cases</strong></p>
<p>Under current California law, emotional distress damages are generally not permitted in legal malpractice cases because the courts regard most such claims [rightly, in the view of Decs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
