Comments on: Update: store’s refusal to permit display of facial jewelry not unlawful https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-stores-refusal-to-permit-display-of-facial-jewelry-not-unlawful/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:21:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: Tattoos and piercings in the workplace https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-stores-refusal-to-permit-display-of-facial-jewelry-not-unlawful/comment-page-1/#comment-29573 Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:21:11 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1685#comment-29573 […] Trebay, “Tattoos Gain Even More Visibility”, New York Times, Sept. 25). Earlier here, here, here, […]

]]> By: Appellate Law https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-stores-refusal-to-permit-display-of-facial-jewelry-not-unlawful/comment-page-1/#comment-1006 Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:07:26 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1685#comment-1006 CA1 — Correcting Overlawyered.com in Cloutier

Overlawyered.com incorrectly reads Cloutier v. Costco. — Corrected

]]> By: Appellate Law https://www.overlawyered.com/2004/12/update-stores-refusal-to-permit-display-of-facial-jewelry-not-unlawful/comment-page-1/#comment-1005 Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:42:56 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1685#comment-1005 CA1 — Correcting Overlawyered.com in Cloutier

Overlawyered.com incorrectly reads Cloutier v. Costco.

]]>