Comments on: Demand for shaker abstinence https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/demand-for-shaker-abstinence/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:23:06 +0000 hourly 1 By: U.S. Food Policy https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/demand-for-shaker-abstinence/comment-page-1/#comment-1143 Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:38:49 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1949#comment-1143 Weblogging about salt

It’s enough to make me feel like the kid who wore the wrong brand of tennis shoes. Few webloggers this week shared my reasonably sympathetic view of CSPI’s renewed lawsuit about salt.

]]> By: f/k/a . . . . https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/demand-for-shaker-abstinence/comment-page-1/#comment-1142 Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:59:37 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1949#comment-1142 the fly resettles

lightining– the fly resettles in the same spot

]]> By: A Stitch in Haste https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/demand-for-shaker-abstinence/comment-page-1/#comment-1141 Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:01:09 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1949#comment-1141 Rubbing Salt in the Bureaucracy

No one, not even the yahoos at CSPI, would seriously consider banning table salt (though perhaps we’ll start seeing calls for a “salt tax”). So where instead do they turn their sights? Of course, the restaurant and processed food industries. In other…

]]>