<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Light posting; Mencimer reply	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/light-posting-mencimer-reply/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/light-posting-mencimer-reply/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/light-posting-mencimer-reply/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 22:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1921#comment-1127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Litigation lobby can&#039;t get its talking points straight&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;The [Class Action Fairness Act] is the first significant Congressional tort &#039;reform&#039; victory for the radical right and a catastrophe for workers and consumers.&quot;(Dan Zegart, &quot;Tort &#039;Reform&#039; Triumphs&quot;, The Nation Online, Feb. 17).&quot;Corporations may rue th...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Litigation lobby can&#8217;t get its talking points straight</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The [Class Action Fairness Act] is the first significant Congressional tort &#8216;reform&#8217; victory for the radical right and a catastrophe for workers and consumers.&#8221;(Dan Zegart, &#8220;Tort &#8216;Reform&#8217; Triumphs&#8221;, The Nation Online, Feb. 17).&#8221;Corporations may rue th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Notes from the (Legal) Underground		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/light-posting-mencimer-reply/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notes from the (Legal) Underground]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1921#comment-1126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The Washington Monthly v. Overlawyered&lt;/strong&gt;

Have you read Stephanie Mencimer&#039;s article about the myth of American&#039;s lawsuit crisis? I last posted about it on October 8, 2004. At that time, I was alerting readers to the fact that Mencimer herself had replied on this website
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Washington Monthly v. Overlawyered</strong></p>
<p>Have you read Stephanie Mencimer&#8217;s article about the myth of American&#8217;s lawsuit crisis? I last posted about it on October 8, 2004. At that time, I was alerting readers to the fact that Mencimer herself had replied on this website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
