<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More on the $105 million Aramark verdict	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/more-on-the-105-million-aramark-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/more-on-the-105-million-aramark-verdict/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 14:29:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/more-on-the-105-million-aramark-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1854#comment-1087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&quot;2005&#039;s Top Ten Jury Verdicts&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

The new WSJ Law Blog summarizes (Jan. 16) Lawyers Weekly&#039;s annual compilation of cases. As Lawyers Weekly tells it, the top verdicts this year were both somewhat lower and more closely linked to actual damages...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;2005&#8217;s Top Ten Jury Verdicts&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>The new WSJ Law Blog summarizes (Jan. 16) Lawyers Weekly&#8217;s annual compilation of cases. As Lawyers Weekly tells it, the top verdicts this year were both somewhat lower and more closely linked to actual damages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gut Rumbles		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/02/more-on-the-105-million-aramark-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gut Rumbles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=1854#comment-1086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;bizarro world&lt;/strong&gt;

Here&#039;s a good post with a lot of good links. Just how ridiculous can we be in assigning responsibility for...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bizarro world</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a good post with a lot of good links. Just how ridiculous can we be in assigning responsibility for&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
