<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Negligent sex	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/05/negligent-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/05/negligent-sex/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 08:18:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Wampum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/05/negligent-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-1264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wampum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2005 08:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2220#comment-1264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK&lt;/strong&gt;

I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK</strong></p>
<p>I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wampum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/05/negligent-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-1263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wampum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 11:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2220#comment-1263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK&lt;/strong&gt;

I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wanton and Reckless Sex Bad, Negligent Sex OK</strong></p>
<p>I wonder what James Dobson would make of the decision in a recent Massachusetts lawsuit. Link via Walter Olson at Overlawyered. The case involves the type of mundane, everyday facts that one often encounters: The summary judgment record, viewed in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Musings from Brian J. Noggle		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/05/negligent-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Musings from Brian J. Noggle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 12:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2220#comment-1262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Judicial Pr0n&lt;/strong&gt;

02-P-381 Appeals Court: JOHN DOE[1] vs. MARY MOE.[2]....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Judicial Pr0n</strong></p>
<p>02-P-381 Appeals Court: JOHN DOE[1] vs. MARY MOE.[2]&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
