<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Heather Mac Donald on Dahlia Lithwick	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/07/heather-mac-donald-on-dahlia-lithwick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/07/heather-mac-donald-on-dahlia-lithwick/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 13:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/07/heather-mac-donald-on-dahlia-lithwick/comment-page-1/#comment-1322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2394#comment-1322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Dahlia Lithwick&#039;s Roberts smear&lt;/strong&gt;

As if she needed to epitomize my critique, Dahlia Lithwick (Jul. 8 substitutes easy snark for legal analysis in Judge Roberts&#039; decision in the famous Hedgepeth v. WMATA &quot;french-fry case&quot;:[Judge John Roberts] doesn&#039;t appear to be crusading for a wholesa...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dahlia Lithwick&#8217;s Roberts smear</strong></p>
<p>As if she needed to epitomize my critique, Dahlia Lithwick (Jul. 8 substitutes easy snark for legal analysis in Judge Roberts&#8217; decision in the famous Hedgepeth v. WMATA &#8220;french-fry case&#8221;:[Judge John Roberts] doesn&#8217;t appear to be crusading for a wholesa&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/07/heather-mac-donald-on-dahlia-lithwick/comment-page-1/#comment-1321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2394#comment-1321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Women&#039;s jurisprudence?&lt;/strong&gt;

Heather Mac Donald shudders to think of such a thing, the opinions of Dahlia Lithwick notwithstanding. More: And Ted Frank has a lot to say at Overlawyered (Jul. 9)....
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Women&#8217;s jurisprudence?</strong></p>
<p>Heather Mac Donald shudders to think of such a thing, the opinions of Dahlia Lithwick notwithstanding. More: And Ted Frank has a lot to say at Overlawyered (Jul. 9)&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
