<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: In today&#8217;s WSJ: sovereign immunity in Washington	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/in-todays-wsj-sovereign-immunity-in-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/in-todays-wsj-sovereign-immunity-in-washington/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:01:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/in-todays-wsj-sovereign-immunity-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2940#comment-1804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;ACLU appeals Castle Rock v. Gonzales to int&#039;l &quot;human rights&quot; tribunal&lt;/strong&gt;

Reaffirming the general deference paid to state sovereign immunity, and following in the footsteps of its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, the Supreme Court this June in Castle Rock v. Gonzales declined to create a constitutional right to...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU appeals Castle Rock v. Gonzales to int&#8217;l &#8220;human rights&#8221; tribunal</strong></p>
<p>Reaffirming the general deference paid to state sovereign immunity, and following in the footsteps of its 1989 decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County, the Supreme Court this June in Castle Rock v. Gonzales declined to create a constitutional right to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/in-todays-wsj-sovereign-immunity-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2940#comment-1803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Sovereign immunity, cont&#039;d&lt;/strong&gt;

Following up on my WSJ piece about the problems that arose for the state of Washington when it came to be exposed to lawsuits alleging that it had failed to prevent some types of crime...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sovereign immunity, cont&#8217;d</strong></p>
<p>Following up on my WSJ piece about the problems that arose for the state of Washington when it came to be exposed to lawsuits alleging that it had failed to prevent some types of crime&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: markm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/in-todays-wsj-sovereign-immunity-in-washington/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 11:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2940#comment-1802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d think the real problem is that the state&#039;s tort laws have left &lt;i&gt;everyone&lt;/i&gt; vulnerable to ridiculous lawsuits, not that the state failed to exempt itself.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d think the real problem is that the state&#8217;s tort laws have left <i>everyone</i> vulnerable to ridiculous lawsuits, not that the state failed to exempt itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
