<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: Morgan Stanley $1.5 billion verdict	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/update-morgan-stanley-15-billion-verdict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/update-morgan-stanley-15-billion-verdict/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/update-morgan-stanley-15-billion-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2914#comment-1764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Turning over the e-mail&lt;/strong&gt;

Under current civil procedure rules, parties, upon request, and with very few limits, must turn over all relevant documents to the opposing party. In the twenty-first century, that includes e-mail. Failure to turn over enough...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Turning over the e-mail</strong></p>
<p>Under current civil procedure rules, parties, upon request, and with very few limits, must turn over all relevant documents to the opposing party. In the twenty-first century, that includes e-mail. Failure to turn over enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/update-morgan-stanley-15-billion-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-1763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2914#comment-1763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Coleman v. Morgan Stanley&lt;/strong&gt;

Financier Ronald Perelman wins $604 million, with a request for punitive damages still to come, against Morgan Stanley on claims that the Wall Street firm defrauded him seven years ago when he sold camping equipment...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coleman v. Morgan Stanley</strong></p>
<p>Financier Ronald Perelman wins $604 million, with a request for punitive damages still to come, against Morgan Stanley on claims that the Wall Street firm defrauded him seven years ago when he sold camping equipment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
