<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Vatican as defendant	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/vatican-as-defendant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/vatican-as-defendant/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/vatican-as-defendant/comment-page-1/#comment-1748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2901#comment-1748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Foreign sovereign immunity watch&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;The US Supreme Court has allowed a lawsuit against the Vatican Bank to go forward, despite arguments that the suit involved foreign-policy issues that are not within the jurisdiction of American federal courts. ... The suit, first filed in a...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Foreign sovereign immunity watch</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The US Supreme Court has allowed a lawsuit against the Vatican Bank to go forward, despite arguments that the suit involved foreign-policy issues that are not within the jurisdiction of American federal courts. &#8230; The suit, first filed in a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/vatican-as-defendant/comment-page-1/#comment-1747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 22:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2901#comment-1747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Update: &quot;Texas judge dismisses lawsuit against Pope&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

Head-of-state immunity comes through for the Pontiff in a case alleging abuse cover-up. See Dec. 14, etc. (Catholic World News, Dec. 22). &quot;The U.S. Department of State issued a suggestion of immunity in May, requesting...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: &#8220;Texas judge dismisses lawsuit against Pope&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>Head-of-state immunity comes through for the Pontiff in a case alleging abuse cover-up. See Dec. 14, etc. (Catholic World News, Dec. 22). &#8220;The U.S. Department of State issued a suggestion of immunity in May, requesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Collins		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2005/12/vatican-as-defendant/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Collins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2901#comment-1746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the information in the article about lawyers trying to sue the Vatican over abuse committed by priests is correct, then couldn&#039;t a case be made that a church is in effect an embassy or legation of the Vatican and thus subject to Vatican law?

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the information in the article about lawyers trying to sue the Vatican over abuse committed by priests is correct, then couldn&#8217;t a case be made that a church is in effect an embassy or legation of the Vatican and thus subject to Vatican law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
