<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: lawyers&#8217; &#8220;pit bull&#8221; ads	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-lawyers-pit-bull-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-lawyers-pit-bull-ads/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-lawyers-pit-bull-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2992#comment-1938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;1-800-PIT-BULL: no urban legend&lt;/strong&gt;

At a June 30 debate on lawyers&#039; advertising sponsored by the Orlando Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society, plaintiff&#039;s lawyer John Morgan challenged Republican Rep. David Simmons for repeatedly referring to a law firm&#039;s having...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1-800-PIT-BULL: no urban legend</strong></p>
<p>At a June 30 debate on lawyers&#8217; advertising sponsored by the Orlando Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society, plaintiff&#8217;s lawyer John Morgan challenged Republican Rep. David Simmons for repeatedly referring to a law firm&#8217;s having&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-lawyers-pit-bull-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-1937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=2992#comment-1937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Update: 1-800-PIT-BULL&lt;/strong&gt;

According to David Giacalone (Sept. 15), a referee/judge has decided that the law firm of Pape &amp; Chandler has a constitutional right to use a logo depicting a pit bull and a 1-800-PIT-BULL telephone line,...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: 1-800-PIT-BULL</strong></p>
<p>According to David Giacalone (Sept. 15), a referee/judge has decided that the law firm of Pape &#038; Chandler has a constitutional right to use a logo depicting a pit bull and a 1-800-PIT-BULL telephone line,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
