<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Update: &#8220;Protests Put Netflix Settlement On Hold&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-protests-put-netflix-settlement-on-hold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-protests-put-netflix-settlement-on-hold/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-protests-put-netflix-settlement-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-1967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3011#comment-1967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Bloggers Challenge Class-Action Settlement&lt;/strong&gt;

I don&#039;t usually link to registration-required sites, but this article is worth it (and the registration is not too intrusive). Charles Buck writes about the reaction to the Netflix class-action settlement, and makes this observation...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bloggers Challenge Class-Action Settlement</strong></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t usually link to registration-required sites, but this article is worth it (and the registration is not too intrusive). Charles Buck writes about the reaction to the Netflix class-action settlement, and makes this observation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-protests-put-netflix-settlement-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-1966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3011#comment-1966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Frank Chavez v. Netflix Class Action settlement&lt;/strong&gt;

Netflix has settled a purported class action in California state court complaining about alleged false advertising over &quot;unlimited&quot; DVD rentals. One is reminded of Lionel Hutz:&quot;Mr. Simpson, this is the most blatant case of false...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Frank Chavez v. Netflix Class Action settlement</strong></p>
<p>Netflix has settled a purported class action in California state court complaining about alleged false advertising over &#8220;unlimited&#8221; DVD rentals. One is reminded of Lionel Hutz:&#8221;Mr. Simpson, this is the most blatant case of false&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/01/update-protests-put-netflix-settlement-on-hold/comment-page-1/#comment-1965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3011#comment-1965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;&quot;FTC objects to Netflix settlement&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;

&quot;The Federal Trade Commission is asking a California judge to reject a proposed class-action settlement between consumers and the Internet DVD rental service Netflix, saying the agreement &#039;appears dangerously close to being a promotional gimmick.&#039;...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;FTC objects to Netflix settlement&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;The Federal Trade Commission is asking a California judge to reject a proposed class-action settlement between consumers and the Internet DVD rental service Netflix, saying the agreement &#8216;appears dangerously close to being a promotional gimmick.&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
