Comments on: “Feds say Pellicano taped client talks” https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:33:24 +0000 hourly 1 By: Overlawyered https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2249 Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:33:24 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2249 Pellicano fallout, cont’d

“While top entertainment lawyer Terry Christensen is the only attorney indicted so far in connection with [indicted private investigator Anthony] Pellicano, several others face litigation that could cripple their practices — and possibly break up…

]]> By: Gunner https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2248 Sat, 18 Feb 2006 14:25:50 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2248 I have not followed this story much. I find this new information very interesting. It seems the ones who pull the strings never get caught.

]]> By: Walter Olson https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2247 Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:24:32 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2247 Given the context of the rest of the piece, I think it’s safe to assume that AP intends “have” to be the verb, meaning merely that the feds are in possession of such tapes.

]]> By: kingmanor https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/feds-say-pellicano-taped-client-talks/comment-page-1/#comment-2246 Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:15:09 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3124#comment-2246 The sentence from the AP article is not written well. Is “have” the verb, or is “taped”? In other words did the prosecution reveal that they taped converstions, or that they have them in their possession.

]]>