<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Thumbnail images held potentially infringing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/thumbnail-images-held-potentially-infringing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/thumbnail-images-held-potentially-infringing/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:28:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Perry		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/02/thumbnail-images-held-potentially-infringing/comment-page-1/#comment-2296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Perry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3142#comment-2296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Amazing! From the news story, it looks like the only difference between this case and that of Kelly v. Ariba Soft (also 9th Circuit and decided the opposite way) is that the porn site also sold its photos as thumbnails.

Does that mean that an author, for some reason not wanting to be quoted under fair use, could sell all the individual paragraphs from his book separately and prevent anone else from quoting from the book.

Let&#039;s hope not. Such a situation would make a hash of fair use.

--Mike Perry, Inkling Books, Seattle

P.S. And I love Ariba. It was a key component in my (successful) copyright dispute with the Tolkien estate over a Lord of the Rings chronology, &lt;i&gt;Untangling Tolkien.&lt;/i&gt; The sort of terse snapshots of events needed for a detailed chronology, I argued, are like the thumbnails of art in Ariba. If the latter is fair use, then so it the former.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing! From the news story, it looks like the only difference between this case and that of Kelly v. Ariba Soft (also 9th Circuit and decided the opposite way) is that the porn site also sold its photos as thumbnails.</p>
<p>Does that mean that an author, for some reason not wanting to be quoted under fair use, could sell all the individual paragraphs from his book separately and prevent anone else from quoting from the book.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope not. Such a situation would make a hash of fair use.</p>
<p>&#8211;Mike Perry, Inkling Books, Seattle</p>
<p>P.S. And I love Ariba. It was a key component in my (successful) copyright dispute with the Tolkien estate over a Lord of the Rings chronology, <i>Untangling Tolkien.</i> The sort of terse snapshots of events needed for a detailed chronology, I argued, are like the thumbnails of art in Ariba. If the latter is fair use, then so it the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
