<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BlackBerry dispute settles for $612M	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/blackberry-dispute-settles-for-612m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/blackberry-dispute-settles-for-612m/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Overlawyered		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/blackberry-dispute-settles-for-612m/comment-page-1/#comment-2380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Overlawyered]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3182#comment-2380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Update: tasty BlackBerry fees&lt;/strong&gt;

Having represented patent-holding company NTP Inc. in its lengthy and much-criticized suit against BlackBerry maker Research in Motion (Mar. 4, etc.), the 250-lawyer Washington, D.C. law firm of Wiley, Rein &amp; Fielding is going to...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update: tasty BlackBerry fees</strong></p>
<p>Having represented patent-holding company NTP Inc. in its lengthy and much-criticized suit against BlackBerry maker Research in Motion (Mar. 4, etc.), the 250-lawyer Washington, D.C. law firm of Wiley, Rein &#038; Fielding is going to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/blackberry-dispute-settles-for-612m/comment-page-1/#comment-2379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3182#comment-2379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, will the people defending the patent holders in this case (oops, EX-patent holders) and the system in general finally SHUT UP?!?  The patents were ruled bogus, and they still got $612 million.  How much more broken can the system be?!?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, will the people defending the patent holders in this case (oops, EX-patent holders) and the system in general finally SHUT UP?!?  The patents were ruled bogus, and they still got $612 million.  How much more broken can the system be?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
