Comments on: Dating service sued for turning away married man https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:50:55 +0000 hourly 1 By: “Suit forces eHarmony to offer gay dating service” https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-34998 Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:50:55 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-34998 […] 19, FoxNews.com)(via Friedersdorf, see also Mataconis). Earlier coverage: Jun. 1 and Jun. 8, 2007; Mar. 26, 2006 (married man wants listing). More: lawyer in parallel California suit against eHarmony says it […]

]]> By: wavemaker https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2540 Thu, 30 Mar 2006 22:11:57 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2540 Assuming that gender is also one of the protected classes, what in the world are they gonna do about the unisex health clubs?

Huh…

]]> By: David Wilson https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2539 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:12:17 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2539 Meanwhile, you could just as easily imagine a spouse suing eHarmony for “tortious interference with the marriage” because it ALLOWED marrieds to list. You know the legal culture is out of control when any imaginable course of action would lead to suit.

]]> By: some potential date https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dating-service-sued-for-turning-away-married-man/comment-page-1/#comment-2538 Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:10:10 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3271#comment-2538 I had a great comment about this guy, but then I deleted it because I figured I might get sued!

And when I thought about the situation, I realized any editorial comment would be superfluous anyway!

]]>