<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Don&#8217;t use sarcasm&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dont-use-sarcasm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dont-use-sarcasm/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dont-use-sarcasm/comment-page-1/#comment-2392</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3190#comment-2392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One can, with sufficient creativity, imagine a scenario by which an executive broke down and admitted criminal activity in front of seventeen executives in response to a critical analysts&#039; report and then only one of the people at the meeting remembered a statement with such dramatic ramifications, but sarcasm seems to be the much more likely explanation for the line &quot;They&#039;re on to us.&quot;

Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-03-06-enron-mon_x.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more permanent link&lt;/a&gt;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can, with sufficient creativity, imagine a scenario by which an executive broke down and admitted criminal activity in front of seventeen executives in response to a critical analysts&#8217; report and then only one of the people at the meeting remembered a statement with such dramatic ramifications, but sarcasm seems to be the much more likely explanation for the line &#8220;They&#8217;re on to us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/energy/2006-03-06-enron-mon_x.htm" rel="nofollow">more permanent link</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Walker Texas Ranger		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/dont-use-sarcasm/comment-page-1/#comment-2391</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Walker Texas Ranger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3190#comment-2391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What makes you think that the comment &lt;b&gt;had&lt;/b&gt; to be sarcasm?  That is only how the defendant characterized his comment.  Is there a possibility that it wasn&#039;t sarcasm?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think that the comment <b>had</b> to be sarcasm?  That is only how the defendant characterized his comment.  Is there a possibility that it wasn&#8217;t sarcasm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
