<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Medical wisdom patentable?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/medical-wisdom-patentable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/medical-wisdom-patentable/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:37:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: IAAL		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/medical-wisdom-patentable/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IAAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3252#comment-2477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The NY Times author mucks up the facts a bit.  You can&#039;t get a remedy for suing a medical practitioner for infringing a method patent related to a medical procedure.  (See 35 USC 287(c)(1)).  Therefore, while he certainly infringes, there will be NO remedy available against the Dr under the current law.

You can get an infringement action and a remedy for inducement or contributory infringement from the publishing companies though.  Just thought I&#039;d focus this issue a bit.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times author mucks up the facts a bit.  You can&#8217;t get a remedy for suing a medical practitioner for infringing a method patent related to a medical procedure.  (See 35 USC 287(c)(1)).  Therefore, while he certainly infringes, there will be NO remedy available against the Dr under the current law.</p>
<p>You can get an infringement action and a remedy for inducement or contributory infringement from the publishing companies though.  Just thought I&#8217;d focus this issue a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/medical-wisdom-patentable/comment-page-1/#comment-2478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3252#comment-2478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Ironies of the &lt;em&gt;Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;

Jonathan at his blog notes that the New York Times&#039; editorialists nod their approval at patent reform, but not class action reform, even though the two kinds of reform share many similarities in their aim to curb baseless litigation. Could...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ironies of the <em>Times</em></strong></p>
<p>Jonathan at his blog notes that the New York Times&#8217; editorialists nod their approval at patent reform, but not class action reform, even though the two kinds of reform share many similarities in their aim to curb baseless litigation. Could&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
