<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Selling short, then suing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PointOfLaw Forum		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PointOfLaw Forum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 23:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3170#comment-2349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Short &#039;em, then sue &#039;em&lt;/strong&gt;

A reminder that our Featured Discussion between Moin Yahya and Larry Ribstein has been proceeding through the week. Their topic: what if anything should be done about the phenomenon of lawyers&#039; or their confederates&#039; selling short the stocks of target...
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Short &#8217;em, then sue &#8217;em</strong></p>
<p>A reminder that our Featured Discussion between Moin Yahya and Larry Ribstein has been proceeding through the week. Their topic: what if anything should be done about the phenomenon of lawyers&#8217; or their confederates&#8217; selling short the stocks of target&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trolling In Shallow Water		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/comment-page-1/#comment-2348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trolling In Shallow Water]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3170#comment-2348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Gaming the system&lt;/strong&gt;

There is no regulatory scheme so airtight that no one can figure out a way to game it.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gaming the system</strong></p>
<p>There is no regulatory scheme so airtight that no one can figure out a way to game it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shivering Timbers		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shivering Timbers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3170#comment-2347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It sounds a lot like insider trading, and I don&#039;t think it would be too hard to make the charge stick.

The definition of &quot;inside information&quot; is only that it be material and nonpublic.  &quot;Material&quot; means that the typical investor would want to know the information before making an investment decision.  So a big lawsuit almost certainly counts.

But it is NOT necessary for the &quot;inside information&quot; to be known by the company itself.

An analogous situation would be if Company X was about to make a hostile takeover offer for company Y.  If you worked at Company X you could not legally buy stock in Company Y in order to profit from the announcement.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds a lot like insider trading, and I don&#8217;t think it would be too hard to make the charge stick.</p>
<p>The definition of &#8220;inside information&#8221; is only that it be material and nonpublic.  &#8220;Material&#8221; means that the typical investor would want to know the information before making an investment decision.  So a big lawsuit almost certainly counts.</p>
<p>But it is NOT necessary for the &#8220;inside information&#8221; to be known by the company itself.</p>
<p>An analogous situation would be if Company X was about to make a hostile takeover offer for company Y.  If you worked at Company X you could not legally buy stock in Company Y in order to profit from the announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: markm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/03/selling-short-then-suing/comment-page-1/#comment-2346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3170#comment-2346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That sounds like insider trading to me.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like insider trading to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
