<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ford Foundation Miffs Michigan A.G.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/ford-foundation-miffs-michigan-ag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/ford-foundation-miffs-michigan-ag/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:08:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Smitty		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/ford-foundation-miffs-michigan-ag/comment-page-1/#comment-2581</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smitty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3287#comment-2581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Organizational papers say the Ford Foundation&#039;s purpose was to &quot;receive and administer funds for scientific, education and charitable purposes, all for the public welfare.&quot;

I would argue that &quot;public welfare&quot; only included the United States of America.

Our &quot;public lands&quot; are owned by the citizens, NOT THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY.

I&#039;d also argue that &quot;the public&quot; receives no benefit or &quot;welfare&quot; from the foundation&#039;s foreign endeavors and in some cases might work against the American public&#039;s scientific, education and charitable purposes.



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Organizational papers say the Ford Foundation&#8217;s purpose was to &#8220;receive and administer funds for scientific, education and charitable purposes, all for the public welfare.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would argue that &#8220;public welfare&#8221; only included the United States of America.</p>
<p>Our &#8220;public lands&#8221; are owned by the citizens, NOT THE GLOBAL COMMUNITY.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also argue that &#8220;the public&#8221; receives no benefit or &#8220;welfare&#8221; from the foundation&#8217;s foreign endeavors and in some cases might work against the American public&#8217;s scientific, education and charitable purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
