Comments on: Netflix claims a patent on renting movies on-line https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/netflix-claims-a-patent-on-renting-movies-on-line/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:35:27 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ted https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/netflix-claims-a-patent-on-renting-movies-on-line/comment-page-1/#comment-2602 Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:35:27 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3297#comment-2602 No coupon, but a success in the lawsuit will result in a monopoly for Netflix — and thus price increases.

Since there’s unlikely to be resolution before 2010, the more likely scenario is that Netflix is trying to gain a competitive advantage through a war of attrition with a financially-strapped competitor.

(Disclosure: I sold my BBI stock today.)

]]> By: Peter https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/04/netflix-claims-a-patent-on-renting-movies-on-line/comment-page-1/#comment-2601 Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:22:11 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3297#comment-2601 I am trying to retrieve from the dark recesses of my memory what the required qualities of a patent are. From my graduate-school “science and the law” class, I seem to remember the requirements of novelty and significance. What, particularly, is patent-worthy about NetFlix’s business plan? Internet access? Use of the US Postal System? It’s a clever model they have, but doesn’t strike this layman as patent-able.

But as a NetFlix subscriber, I wonder if I can look forward to a coupon for a free movie rental if NetFlix should prevail.

]]>