Yes.

The other thing about these suits, aside the general repulsiveness already mentioned, is th absolutely WONDERFUL feelings these suits must generate in the actual child.

“I’m so terrible and hard to take care of that my parents deserve money for not aborting me.”

Those parents are selfish, sick people.

Compensation for long-term care issues I might could process/accept – IF the parents were not properly tested and counseled about “options” before the child was born. But for parents to say that their child’s very life is “painful” to them . . . to whine that they “suffer” and are in “misery” because their child was born . . . to claim that they deserve millions of dollars in “damages” for an act of God . . . that no doctor, short of ending the child’s life before it began, could prevent.

Well, that’s just twisted and sick.

Question. If the child succumbs to this illness while it is still young, does the family get to keep ALL the money?

No, the jury awarded $6mm to help with long-term care. The $8mm was to compensate the “family” for the misery it has suffered, and which it would have avoided had it aborted the unborn child. Even as someone who is generally pro-choice, that’s repulsive.