Comments on: Cat defense fails: Morgan Stanley v. Meow https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/cat-defense-fails-morgan-stanley-v-meow/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Wed, 31 May 2006 08:46:51 +0000 hourly 1 By: E-Bell https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/cat-defense-fails-morgan-stanley-v-meow/comment-page-1/#comment-3050 Wed, 31 May 2006 08:46:51 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3511#comment-3050 “If Respondent is in fact a cat from outer space, then it should have so indicated in its reply, in order to avoid unnecessary perplexity by the Panel. Further, it should have explained why a cat from outer space would allow Mr. Woods to use the disputed domain name. In the absence of such an explanation, the Panel must conclude that, if Respondent is a cat from outer space, then it may have something to hide, and this is indicative of bad faith behavior.”

That’s gold, Jerry! Gold!

]]>