Comments on: Update: Canada high court rejects social-host liability https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/update-canada-high-court-rejects-social-host-liability/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Mon, 08 May 2006 23:23:13 +0000 hourly 1 By: PointOfLaw Forum https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/update-canada-high-court-rejects-social-host-liability/comment-page-1/#comment-2867 Mon, 08 May 2006 23:23:13 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3422#comment-2867 Canada high court to consider social-host liability

Various American jurisdictions impose liability on party-givers who it’s argued should have done more to prevent guests from drinking and driving. Now the Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to consider a case in which Zoe Childs of Oxford Station…

]]> By: Matt https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/update-canada-high-court-rejects-social-host-liability/comment-page-1/#comment-2866 Mon, 08 May 2006 17:05:05 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3422#comment-2866 Thanks goodness for reason (at least up north) winning out. If only more judges and juries followed suit, so much that is wrong would be set right. Score two for Canada this week (go Nash and the Suns!!!).

]]> By: AL Grad https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/05/update-canada-high-court-rejects-social-host-liability/comment-page-1/#comment-2865 Mon, 08 May 2006 10:33:17 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3422#comment-2865 Yay!! Let’s throw a party in Canada!! Does that hold true in the United States?

]]>