Comments on: Assumption of risk (mollusc dept.) https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/ Chronicling the high cost of our legal system Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:27:59 +0000 hourly 1 By: wavemaker https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/comment-page-1/#comment-3177 Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:49:05 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3556#comment-3177 This closely follows the 1964 Webster case we posted on last month.

“Judge John Galasso dismissed the lawsuit, saying Slaymaker should have had a “reasonable expectation” that a dish containing mussels could have shells in it.” Unfortunately, I cannot locate a copy of the opinion on-line, but I’ll bet Webster is cited in the decision.

]]> By: bird dog https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/06/assumption-of-risk-mollusc-dept/comment-page-1/#comment-3176 Fri, 09 Jun 2006 07:36:58 +0000 http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3556#comment-3176 How many Americans are walking around just praying that something sue-able will happen to them? Remember the old bumpersticker “Please hit me. I need the money”? I am shocked! Shellfish have shells?

]]>