Comments on: 151-proof rum is flammable, who knew?

By: Bill Hunter

Bill Hunter — Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:49:10 +0000

I bought a bottle of 151 proof rum with the flame arrestor in the neck. The first time I saw a bottle of that hi-test and saw the flammable warning label “Do not pour near an open flame or use for flaming alcohol drinks” I immediately thought “Man I *gotta* drink some of this!” and bought the bottle… love the stuff!

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:05:40 +0000

I going to guess that the lawyer that filed this was having a slow week.

By: PaulV

PaulV — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:47:00 +0000

Everything above 100 proof is flammable

By: mjs

mjs — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:21:14 +0000

I have to concur with “booger.” The last bottle of Bacardi 151 that I had (purchased probably about two years ago, finished a couple of months ago) had a screen on the top of the bottle, presumably to supress fire. Additionally, there were warnings along the top of the bottle near the opening that said the product was flammible.

mjs

By: The Wagon

The Wagon — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:09:45 +0000

Flaming Dr. Pepper

Ingredients:
One shot of Amaretto topped off with 151
One half pint of light beer

Light the 151 on fire, drop the shot into the beer, and then drain the glass. It tastes like Dr. Pepper.

By: JKoerner

JKoerner — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:55:50 +0000

So if she is putting rubbing alcohol on a cut or gas in her car and some third-party idiot decides to add fire to the mix it is the product maker’s fault? This is a highly flamible product that is expressly labeled as such. This is a blatant attempt to go after the deepest pockets, or as my tort professor would say, put the cost of injury on the party most able to pay. Communist.

By: booger

booger — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:51:42 +0000

The article suggests a third party ignited the alcohol and the plaintiff was a bystander. I’d like some data on the flash point difference between 151 proof rum and 80 proof (or whatever ‘regular’ rum is). The last bottle of 151 I saw had an honest-to-god fire supressing screen in the neck to prevent exactly this problem. Remember ‘Grizzly Adams’?

By: MilesG

MilesG — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 06:20:46 +0000

Methinks the defective product here is the brain of the plaintiff… I suggest that she lays-off the booze!