<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BetOnSports.com prosecution, cont&#8217;d	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/betonsportscom-prosecution-contd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/betonsportscom-prosecution-contd/</link>
	<description>Chronicling the high cost of our legal system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 03:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Deoxy		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/betonsportscom-prosecution-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-3578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deoxy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3760#comment-3578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bob,

To play devils advocate, that would mean that most members of the media (or at least most photo-journalists) in this country would be arrested the moment they step foot into almost any Islamic country, as posting a photo of a woman clad in anything &quot;immodest&quot; is gnerally considered a crime in those countries (and most of what women wear in this country would classify as &quot;immodest&quot;).

That&#039;s the standard you are suggesting...

Not sayig whether that&#039;s the correct standard or not, just making sure you realize the full implications.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>To play devils advocate, that would mean that most members of the media (or at least most photo-journalists) in this country would be arrested the moment they step foot into almost any Islamic country, as posting a photo of a woman clad in anything &#8220;immodest&#8221; is gnerally considered a crime in those countries (and most of what women wear in this country would classify as &#8220;immodest&#8221;).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the standard you are suggesting&#8230;</p>
<p>Not sayig whether that&#8217;s the correct standard or not, just making sure you realize the full implications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: markm		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/betonsportscom-prosecution-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[markm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3760#comment-3577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bob, the first question is, how does the US have jurisdiction over acts committed outside the US?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, the first question is, how does the US have jurisdiction over acts committed outside the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bob montgomery		</title>
		<link>https://www.overlawyered.com/2006/07/betonsportscom-prosecution-contd/comment-page-1/#comment-3576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob montgomery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://overlawyered.com/wpblog/?p=3760#comment-3576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t really see the problem here - if you break a US law, then why shouldn&#039;t you expect to be arrested if you are foolish enough to come to the US?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see the problem here &#8211; if you break a US law, then why shouldn&#8217;t you expect to be arrested if you are foolish enough to come to the US?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
